<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Kerwin Xiang Liao on Kerwin Liao&#39;s Home Page</title>
    <link>https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Kerwin Xiang Liao on Kerwin Liao&#39;s Home Page</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>PaperMod Contributors</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Conformity and Creativity in Conflict: Cognitive Pluralism and the Reimagining of Educational Aims</title>
      <link>https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/conformity-and-creativity/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/conformity-and-creativity/</guid>
      <description>Formal education claims to cultivate human potential, yet its structure tends to reward conformity over creativity. This paper proposes a normative theory of cognitive pluralism that reimagines education as an ecosystem of developmental cultivation rather than a mechanism of selection, with creativity tempered by wisdom.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hidden Costs of Tournament Logic: Meritocracy, Incentives, and Normative Tensions in Organizations</title>
      <link>https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/tournament-logic/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://kerwinliao.github.io/academic/tournament-logic/</guid>
      <description>A critical reappraisal of tournament theory, the model in organizational economics that treats promotion and pay as rank-order contests. Drawing on Elizabeth Anderson’s relational egalitarianism, the paper argues that tournaments are not only incentive devices but institutional and ideological arrangements that entrench workplace domination and moralize failure.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
